Battle Info  2004-04-22 Gold playoff - first round
 

 
Bored With Life 0 - 2 Lege Artis
 
 

W.O. - Walkover

0-1

Reports
-

Demos
-


 
 

W.O. - Walkover

0-1

Reports
-

Demos
-


 
Comments
 
gaz (62.252.32.4) 2004-04-21 12:27:32
gg (agd horatio)
   
Horatio (213.113.172.74) 2004-04-21 15:17:02
gg, tur f?r dig
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-22 22:54:10
dm3 screen: http://fettan.org/slime/bwl/la_vs_bwl_dm3.jpg e1m2 screen: http://fettan.org/slime/bwl/la_vs_bwl_e1m2.jpg
   
buggy (81.197.0.43) 2004-04-22 22:55:47
gg
   
Angua (212.181.55.76) 2004-04-22 22:57:16
it was gg.
   
troma (193.11.233.13) 2004-04-22 23:03:50
HEHEHE
   
fifi (80.222.181.253) 2004-04-22 23:10:08
slime_of_photoshop strikes again
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-22 23:16:52
? ? ?
   
Janozh (213.112.181.164) 2004-04-22 23:31:43
Fifi thinks u made them up maybe? that they are fictionous.. or something... Nice to see phantasy back in the game.
   
hangman (81.229.98.64) 2004-04-23 10:11:17
slime, what sshots is that? It was wo right? hm...
   
Anonymous (213.64.138.43) 2004-04-23 10:20:09
phantasy in la?
   
fnosk (130.236.221.177) 2004-04-23 10:31:22
Because the NQR admins wouldn't let them play with Phantasy they decided that the losers would report W.O.
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-23 11:41:46
hangman, read fnosks post!!
   
riker (81.226.74.163) 2004-04-23 11:52:34
fixa dc slime
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-23 11:53:04
dc is dead
   
hangman (81.229.98.64) 2004-04-23 12:47:12
done
   
Hagge (217.210.145.76) 2004-04-23 12:54:27
zzzzzzzzzzzzzz?
   
Anonymous (81.229.98.64) 2004-04-23 13:46:56
hm... so u can play with anyone on your team and if u win you get w.o. from other team? strange...
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-23 14:19:49
if both clans agree on that, whats the problem?
   
reppie (217.122.224.185) 2004-04-23 14:40:14
why bend the rules? if you join a league you should play with the rules they made and not make up your own like this imo :)
   
sassa (81.225.231.180) 2004-04-23 14:57:32
DEMOS DEMOS DEMOS
   
Janozh (213.112.181.140) 2004-04-23 15:46:41
Bend my arse plz! No seriously, hope LA can get some allowed players, i mean, can they win NQR in this way?
   
Apollyon (62.206.113.178) 2004-04-23 15:50:14
When Phantasy (whoever that is) wasnt allowed to play in this game how can LA expect him to be allowed to play in the next round? Or w.o. again? Why should LA be allowed to bend the rules? The only sensible thing to do here would be to disqualify LA.
   
Apollyon (62.206.113.178) 2004-04-23 15:51:25
Actually it IS the only sensible thing to do. Unfortunately i am not an admin of this league. LA's attitude stinks seriously.
   
riker (81.226.74.163) 2004-04-23 15:52:51
Apo, we dont care what u think. please be quiet. im the best player in the world and ill do whatever i want. end of story, move along now.
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-23 16:00:21
what rule did we bend?? bwl gave us wo??
   
Max Rebo (62.181.254.15) 2004-04-23 16:00:50
Well, since BWL agreed in full, (I even think it wast hey who suggested this method) I don't see a problem. Phantasy can't play in a game where the other clan refuses this set up.
   
crazy_legs (217.209.171.199) 2004-04-23 16:01:42
to much 2 handle for big bad apo i guess, disqualify dybbuk now!! admins!!!!!
   
Apollyon (62.206.113.178) 2004-04-23 16:04:59
Too bad we are already out of the tournament crazy_legs (all due to my non existent skill). Riker et altera: i dont care how good you are in QW but i have a lot of experience in running leagues and this kind of conduct is bad for this league nor is it the first time coming from the same people. You are lucky that the NQR admin crew doesnt have the guts to make tough decisions.
   
Tuna (212.202.169.220) 2004-04-23 16:06:37
crazy_legs, yes please drag dybbuk into it again.. i almost got bored. btw.. we are already out of the tournament :p
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-23 16:07:39
apo!! what rule did we bend?? plz answer!!
   
crazy_legs (217.209.171.199) 2004-04-23 16:08:06
omg im so sorry! i would really like to see u back inte the nqr, guess there are admins that can fix that too?! they are almost as CrAZy as cRAZy_LeGs
   
riker (81.226.74.163) 2004-04-23 16:09:36
the qw community is not that big anymore. so we just play and pray to not be banned by paradoks. sry, ill guess i have to quit.
   
akke (130.240.202.149) 2004-04-23 16:12:22
the qw high council has decided to ban apollyon from QW, now plz leave.
   
Apollyon (62.206.113.178) 2004-04-23 16:12:45
Slime: "Once of the playoffs have started, no player additions are allowed (except in very exceptional circumstances and only if the admin team approve)." Obviosuly the admin team didnt approve. Yet in a spectacular display of raw intelligence you got yourself awarded a walkover.
   
riker (81.226.74.163) 2004-04-23 16:15:40
wierd that nepra could play for team freedom. and was added during playoffs! guess all this LA hate is popular, but i understand. i would be angry too if someone was so much better then me!!
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-23 16:17:42
so we should get banned because we are super smart?? and BtW band came up with the w.o idea!!
   
unicorn (213.112.136.235) 2004-04-23 16:31:33
uhm, just see it as a w.o. doesnt matter WHY a clan wo's, its their choiche. and apo: i dont see a player addition to la's roster so obviously whatever youresaying is irrelevant.
   
dakoth (213.113.123.55) 2004-04-23 16:41:35
WOs are lame, kkthxbye~!
   
Apollyon (62.206.113.178) 2004-04-23 16:43:12
I dont see "Phantasy" on LA's list of players at this website (LA homepage doesnt work) hence he/she isnt allowed to play in NQR games according to the rules. I wasnt aware of another similar issue yet with Nepra in another game. As it stands now the problem of a non eligible player gets carried into the next round. I have made very bad experiences with carrying problems into further rounds (e.g. SD2 final comes to mind).
   
def (65.50.52.130) 2004-04-23 16:47:06
Apollyon: LA and BWL have not played NQR game, BWL gave W.O. Those are the facts.
   
fifi (80.222.181.253) 2004-04-23 16:52:33
this is so lame!!!! all the whining when fappers left wo and now that another team leaves wo, they arent lame at all!!! maybe its not too late to bring SSC for gold playoffs instead of bwl!!!
   
qmole (130.88.96.65) 2004-04-23 16:55:44
If this was the only way the game was going to get played, then phantasy should have been allowed to play by the admins. But the rules are obviously there to stop clans playing with non-playerlisted members, and that was broken here (albeit in a clever way). As much as I like LA, it's sad that they seem to think they (and BWL) are above the rules. I wouldn't even consider a stunt like this with my clan. I mean, what if everyone started doing it? If a clan only has 3 players 'is it ok if we get a standin and loser submits WO?'. 'Lets play DM6 and loser submits WO' etc. etc. This result is a /very/ bad thing and should be voided.
   
Apollyon (62.206.113.178) 2004-04-23 16:56:35
def: walkovers are lame but who makes up such stories then?
   
qmole (130.88.96.65) 2004-04-23 16:57:47
... and the walkover rules should be changed
   
Goljat (80.221.43.154) 2004-04-23 17:12:06
so we can add players if our opponent agree dont have to ask from next round opponents? we take fix and our opponent says just take it don't care and we can use him for next rounds. Let's play nqr final in 2on2 game with standins and looser of that reports wo. k :)
   
unicorn (213.112.136.235) 2004-04-23 17:27:16
uhm use for next round? where did u get that from goljat? a figment of ur imagination? ;)
   
supa (80.186.73.160) 2004-04-23 18:17:37
So lame, always giving WO's. I'm in agreement with fifi, let's bring SSC in to BWL's place.
   
znappe (213.114.180.244) 2004-04-23 19:31:41
nepra played several games for us earlier in this nqr, he never played for any other team.. he went 'away' for some time because of a misunderstanding, then he came back admins agreed.. nothing strange about that decision.. if he would have played for another team AFTER playing with us the first time then it would have been a problem.. but that was not the case.. so dont drag us in to this lame shit..
   
Legio! (81.224.220.25) 2004-04-23 20:18:41
First of all Mr Apolloyon, get your facts straight before you start accusing the NQR Crew of letting LA bending the rules! We did not let LA get a WO vs BWL, that was BWL's decision without any influence or push by the admins, we actually tried to get them to play the damn game, but they did not want to.
   
Legio! (81.224.220.25) 2004-04-23 20:22:55
Second Mr. I-know-it-all-when-it-comes-to-run-a-QW-League NQR Crew have NOT granted LA of adding another player to their team. Nor have we denied them, we let them plead their case as any other clan would have the oppurtunity to do. Your continuence of bashing NQR Crew about things you don't know the half about is getting to say the very least annoying, get your facts straights before you throw out punches!
   
gaz (62.252.32.4) 2004-04-23 20:37:07
what legio said
   
gaz (62.252.32.4) 2004-04-23 20:37:44
plus, we have not allowed the additions of ANY players during the playoffs thus far, nepra is not on freedom's roster and as it turns out we would have WO'd that game to NRU if freedom had won it.
   
qmole (130.88.96.65) 2004-04-23 20:42:03
You didn't deny or allow them to add phantasy? So what did you do? I can't believe you're letting this stand... this 'trick' effectively allows two clans to play with whatever rules they like to reach their result. If nothing else, it's not fair on the team LA faces next because they could have been playing BwL!
   
Legio! (81.224.220.25) 2004-04-23 20:45:17
Ok let me spell it out to you Qmole, we are making a decision upon Phantasy tonight. And you aren't making any sense..what trick are you refferring to, if i might ask?
   
Anonymous (81.224.220.25) 2004-04-23 20:50:38
"NQR Crew have NOT granted LA of adding another player to their team. Nor have we denied them, we let them plead their case as any other clan would have the oppurtunity to do." I thought that text was pretty self-explainitory, meaning that we have not yet reached a decision upon it, but we will deliver it to LA tonight.
   
Legio! (81.224.220.25) 2004-04-23 20:51:17
WTH, damn comment script piece of crap! The above post was mine ;).
   
qmole (130.88.96.65) 2004-04-23 20:51:34
Agreeing to submit the walkover after playing a non-nqr game...
   
qmole (130.88.96.65) 2004-04-23 20:54:17
Yeah, I understand that... I just thought it would have been sensible to wait for the decision.
   
qmole (130.88.96.65) 2004-04-23 21:05:33
But Legio, I don't have a problem with the NQR crew. I don't know what I'd do to stop these kind of walkovers. I just think it's a bad thing for the league and I'd hate to see more of it...
   
HangTime (213.208.111.197) 2004-04-23 22:58:22
nothing new here really.... games have been played in breach of the rules before countless times, but both teams agree and that's what happens to get the game played. Only way to stop this type of thing is have harsher restrictions on Walkovers (like banning clans/players who leave WOs from future seasons or something)
   
troma (193.11.233.13) 2004-04-23 23:09:42
bwl left wo, plz explain what the problem is, and not by stateing anything about LA?s lame"attitude"
   
error (213.114.96.68) 2004-04-24 00:22:47
This kind of behaviour is perhaps questionable but not against any rules. A similar case would be to lose intentionally in groupgames to get to play a different team in a playoffs. Ps. Its not like phantasy is any better than any other LA player and he hasnt played for any other team this season. I dont really see the problem.
   
troma (193.11.233.13) 2004-04-24 00:47:58
my point exactly
   
FlePser (80.60.182.5) 2004-04-24 08:38:26
LA \o/
   
space (217.209.183.243) 2004-04-24 10:18:01
grow up.
   
crazy_legs (217.209.171.199) 2004-04-24 11:05:49
phantasy has not played a nqr game with la, hard to understand?
   
znappe (213.114.180.244) 2004-04-24 11:45:15
gaz, he were readded to our page.. but if you look more carefully you can see that there is more players missing and that is because i deleted them AFTER the NRU-game.. we cleaned out the lineup.. removing 5 players.. but when we played the game he were there so no, if we would have won we would have just won.. but we didn't since we r on break, gl hf all. ~~~ SUMMER ~~~
   
dag (213.204.182.95) 2004-04-24 14:29:53
the game was mot an nqr game, phantasy has not joined la, this is just a walk over win as i see it... what's all the fuss about?
   
dag (213.204.182.95) 2004-04-24 14:30:08
not...
   
Goljat (80.221.43.154) 2004-04-24 14:42:19
:E
   
luny (212.226.139.122) 2004-04-24 15:30:55
Wonder what kind of response this would've produced if SR had done the same thing ;)
   
lib (194.47.63.35) 2004-04-24 16:05:47
luny: oh. my. god.
   
ParadokS (130.225.71.251) 2004-04-24 16:41:44
I think what Apollyon means, at least that's what I think so too, that this is not just about BWL agreeing to give walkover. LA are putting pressure on opponents to give walkover for a lame game like this. Because if BWL does not, LA would say BWL are lame too for agreeing with "lame nqr rules", or at least it would be implied. It's no secret that we (Slackers) would have TAKEN a walkover from LA any day if they tried to pull off this stunt.. groupgame or finals. I think it shows more how LA think of playing as a top clan in a league, than it does of opponents giving them walkover from fear (or the wrong kind of respect), or taking walkover as a right.
   
crazy_legs (217.209.171.199) 2004-04-24 16:49:16
putting pressure on opponents to give walkover? go say hi to your mother or somethin
   
jkka (62.142.132.96) 2004-04-24 16:50:45
the rules are there to help when both can clans cant agree about how to play the game, kind as a fallback. i dont see any problem about bending the "normal" rules if both clans are 100% behind this. i guess im not the only one that thinks that both clans, spectators, everyone gained from this kinda of a solution, when the game was played afterall
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-24 16:59:36
bwl came up with the wo idea para so stfu plz ok np thx
   
ParadokS (130.225.71.251) 2004-04-24 17:17:47
but it wasn't an nqr game that was played - hence it lost all meaning and value. might as well have been a prac game (which it was), with lame prewar. Hiring standin over serv-u 10 mins before game.. and phantasy of all players. having lineup without akke nabbe or dag, and all to avoid NQR ruleset about adding new players during playoffs don't pass off in my book as a clan simply giving another clan walkover. So you say it's just a game and it's all for fun, and we should stop take it so serious. Well, for me that stunt wasn't fun at all.. and as Andy said "la taking some random player from irc to play 10 min before nqr playoffs, made me not wanna see the game anyway.".
   
moris (146.102.89.69) 2004-04-24 17:20:02
omg, how immature must the cs community be, if our immature qw community calls them immature plz
   
razor (217.209.67.2) 2004-04-24 17:24:36
well if bwl came up with the idea i dont see a problem... if LA couldnt get players i think this was a better solution and nice from BWL than to just take WO, now the game was played at least in one way instead of no game at all.. i think "if both clan agrees" should be a new rule :) also when it comes to maps for example.. if 2 clans wanna fight it out on a specific map they should be allowed... would be fun :) maybe it wouldnt work in World Championship in football... but this is just a very little scene we have.... i wouldnt agree on playing this game if it was vs us thou... the concept is too lame...
   
slime (213.66.135.84) 2004-04-24 17:41:39
whats wrong with phantasy para?
   
sassa (81.225.231.180) 2004-04-24 19:36:42
plz guys... this is just totaly nonesence! Get yourself in the World of QW instead of sitting here and writing stupid comments of a game that never happend!
   
sassa (81.225.231.180) 2004-04-24 19:37:08
*took place*
   
gaz (62.252.32.4) 2004-04-24 20:33:58
nonesence 8) any clown prac?
   
oosi (80.222.72.98) 2004-04-24 22:36:40
well, BWL gave WO, thats a fact. but, if they gave WO because they lost that prac-whatever game vs LA, crew cant actually do anything about it. i tried and crew tried to get them play the game with real lineups. it was me who said that phantasy cant play NQR game since he aint in the list. now, talking about adding players while playoffs going on... zzzz.. there has to be a _good_reason_ if we're going to allow guys join in some clan. since LA has 5-6 playable and active guys, why crew should allow phantasy to join? no, im just asking, this wasn't the decision of crew, i just wanna give you something to think about.
   
space (217.209.183.243) 2004-04-25 02:24:08
Jag hoppas slackers vinner finalen p? W.O, det ?r dem v?rda!
   
space (217.209.183.243) 2004-04-25 02:25:04
i also forgott to tell you guys, im a cunt.
   
Goljat (80.221.43.154) 2004-04-25 10:03:48
onkse tsekkienl?tk?pelaaja niin jaromir j??k?ri?
   
oosi (80.222.72.98) 2004-04-25 10:24:15
gollu o. kerros mulle samal miks vitus noi hurrit puhuu vaa hurreij ;( meen enemm?n paskaks tommosista kommenteista niinku spacella o huoh :<<<<<
   
bwl-UnK (80.92.204.9) 2004-04-25 11:53:37
Guys. On slime's screens we can see prac scores. We try to play and loose vs mixteam ( =3 la + 1 Phanta ). We just cant win. They was very strong. Then we gave WO for NQR. <- Check this Pov. (or u think that we can win vs fullstars-LA-lineup ( = 3 LA +1 Nabbe }or{ = 3 LA + 1 dag ???) We dont think so. Today. (: Just relax and play more.
   
sexC (222.65.103.197) 2004-04-25 12:33:30
hehe UnK well said, end of story
   
forsberg (80.165.142.67) 2004-04-25 13:33:08
znappe as you point out nepra didnt play for anyone else in the meanwhile, did phantasy do that ? The official word was that nepra left freedom, and rejoined for playoffs, eod. The reason one team can add a player and another team cannot is?
   
gaz (62.252.32.4) 2004-04-25 13:53:14
I repeat: the admin team has not authorised ANY player additions since the start of the playoffs.
   
max_power (212.1.241.34) 2004-04-25 16:43:45
fifi supa stfu
   
dag (213.204.182.95) 2004-04-25 18:05:36
gaz: how hard is it to understand.. we don't want to add any players to our nqr team...
   
Legio! (81.224.220.25) 2004-04-25 23:20:52
That's good Dag, because you would'nt be granted an addition in the first place ;). Riker asked us, and we took a decision upon it.
   
znappe (213.114.163.26) 2004-04-27 02:26:46
foppa, he did not get re-added during playoffs, he were added before playoffs as i wrote earlier.. learn to read..
   
mel (194.89.25.14) 2004-04-27 10:41:40
now that hyphen is out, can we add fix and vana to our squad?
   
 
 

League Coverage
 - News
 - Battles
 - Map stats
 - Interviews

 - Division 1
 - Division 2
 - Division 3
 - Division 4
 - Division 5
 - Playoffs

League Info
 - Rules
 - Crew
 - Hall of Fame

    © Nations Quake Rank 2004