Battle Info  2004-02-29 Division 1 - Week 2 (4)
 

 
Slackers 2 - 0 Lege Artis
 
 

W.O. - Walkover

1-0

Reports
-

Demos
-


 
 

W.O. - Walkover

1-0

Reports
-

Demos
-


 
Comments
 
Horatio (213.113.172.227) 2004-02-06 09:00:40
gg
   
fisto (213.101.38.134) 2004-02-07 01:41:12
jag har GUL jacka
   
gaz (62.252.32.7) 2004-02-14 04:09:52
any date set?
   
troma (193.11.233.13) 2004-02-29 23:45:24
mog1 med wo
   
Hagge (217.210.145.76) 2004-02-29 23:45:57
lol? don?t know how many times I?ve seen la ask sr to play this game and even though sr have had 4 players they have said no.. GG!!!!!
   
mrlame (212.151.22.28) 2004-02-29 23:47:04
how can sr get wo on this game?
   
jezaja (193.11.244.51) 2004-02-29 23:49:21
No WOs until last week right??
   
Janozh (213.112.181.186) 2004-02-29 23:49:49
This must be upph?vt now!
   
razor (217.209.67.184) 2004-02-29 23:55:49
why WO??
   
crazymac (80.199.157.54) 2004-03-01 00:07:28
lol?
   
dag (217.211.109.109) 2004-03-01 00:11:26
ehh.. wo?
   
ToT_ejEct (62.78.207.192) 2004-03-01 00:11:30
Wo ? LoL?
   
akke (130.240.202.149) 2004-03-01 00:12:50
LOOOOOOOOOOOL! ok
   
riker (81.226.74.163) 2004-03-01 00:14:01
cool, they are scared!
   
clox (194.236.143.10) 2004-03-01 00:14:50
hagGAHghaghahfhgg
   
Icce (195.67.211.134) 2004-03-01 00:18:39
This game should have been played latest last week. The teams have scheduled the game once but LA didn't appear. SR have tryed after that to get the game going, and I have also been talking with LA to contact SR to set a new date last week, but that obviously never happend. Catch up week is for teams were both agree to play, and that isn't the case here I'm afraid. Sad but true.
   
hlt (80.186.197.111) 2004-03-01 00:18:48
gg
   
Xerial (213.112.254.25) 2004-03-01 00:22:18
Icce I understand but still. No special treatment is acceptable, BUT WO:ing a game like this? 8( "Every civilization is three meals from revolution"
   
slime (213.66.135.170) 2004-03-01 00:24:09
Maybe you should talk to both clans first Icce?
   
boegbullen (82.182.67.62) 2004-03-01 00:27:14
usch ? fy sr ?r vad dem ?r..
   
forsberg (80.199.157.54) 2004-03-01 00:27:35
So SR has gone to admins to get WO in this game ?
   
slime (213.66.135.170) 2004-03-01 00:28:59
yes forsberg, but the admin hasnt contacted us yet :(
   
troma (193.11.233.13) 2004-03-01 00:41:32
i ljuset av dessa fakta tycker jag mitt mog1 st?rks ytterligare
   
sexC (61.171.26.20) 2004-03-01 00:43:15
gg @ adminteam
   
dak (213.113.123.12) 2004-03-01 00:48:32
GG admins. LA players have during that time also joined #slackers and asked to play the game. Perhaps you should talk to more people than just one team before issuing a WO?
   
slebe (62.78.251.99) 2004-03-01 00:48:37
forsberg are u peter forsberg?
   
FlePser (80.60.182.5) 2004-03-01 00:52:23
Icce claims he DID talk to la?
   
barbro (217.210.151.190) 2004-03-01 00:59:12
www.slackers.dk : poll -> Who is next ]SR[? ICCE 78% ;D
   
qmole (193.108.218.98) 2004-03-01 01:15:51
knew this would happen. making the specs wait until the final :p
   
forsberg (80.199.157.54) 2004-03-01 01:16:52
I dont understand why Paradoks would pull a stunt like this so early after the last headlines. He must be fully aware that this is one of the games that cannot, i repeat _CANNOT_, be determined by WO, and the reactions from all the qw lovers about missing this game. Since we cant know who asked who when, i suggest you just follow the rules and let this game be up to chances or played in last week. I understand completely why some people want to know excactly when they are supposed to play, others have other priorities, and this league is made for that.
   
xhrl (24.80.51.162) 2004-03-01 01:25:50
dak, since it has nothing to do with you or your clan...why are you giving me advice and writing sarcasm? your comments do not help. -xhrl.
   
Link (80.203.229.225) 2004-03-01 02:07:33
DRAMA! :DDDDD
   
def (66.185.84.74) 2004-03-01 02:24:37
What am I going to watch tonight? The Oscar Awards or this great new soap opera, tough choice!
   
forsberg (80.199.157.54) 2004-03-01 02:59:36
slebe, no im gaylord focker!!
   
sexC (61.152.211.58) 2004-03-01 04:04:56
this is outrageous...this was the main match of the group stages and someone decided to take that away from the spectators. gg. I'm sure both clans can agree to play sometime soon, assuming of course that admins will let them. Seems like la are eager to play where as sr seem happy with the wo. bgsr
   
error (213.114.96.69) 2004-03-01 08:12:58
:|
   
Max Rebo (62.181.254.15) 2004-03-01 08:52:26
I just can't understand why Slackers would want to push this through, do they already feel that everyone hates them and that thus this WO will not matter? :/ OTOH LA filed for WO against ToT after they failed to show up to a booked game. You didn't see a huge uproar then. I wanted to see this game damnit!
   
Archvile (62.236.142.248) 2004-03-01 09:37:52
It's sad but the catchup week isn't an real option. The other team can just refuse to play if they think they get benefit from not playing. There is no WO anymore in catchup week.
   
razor (217.209.67.184) 2004-03-01 09:57:05
well if both clans just agrees on playing in catchup and if someone would refuse to play then the other just get wo?
   
sexC (61.171.26.20) 2004-03-01 11:09:56
if nqr is more about following the rules a 100% than providing the community with fun and exciting games, well then mission accomplished. If not, let them play the game
   
striker (213.114.39.38) 2004-03-01 11:34:46
jamen detta ?r v?l suver?nt..
   
R2D2 (130.243.79.252) 2004-03-01 13:16:17
Jamen, superduper f?r alla som vill se en av s?songens h?jdarmatcher och s? blir skiten WO'ad. Det ?r ju bra f?r QW-scenen att NQR-admin ger WO ?t ena laget i en av de viktigaste matcherna.. GG@NQR.nu
   
siv (81.226.51.12) 2004-03-01 13:16:53
??????? VERY CLOSE GAME ??????? FFS get rid of this WO and reschedule this game, its the one thing all qw lovers has been waiting for , and what happends, SR backstabbs!
   
Hagge (212.181.114.33) 2004-03-01 14:42:32
backstabbers! B<
   
hib (212.149.240.51) 2004-03-01 15:51:16
sniff henkil?kohtainen VOIVOI to LA
   
ParadokS (130.225.71.251) 2004-03-01 17:38:35
the way the system is build, makes it kinda hard. If a clan dont wanna schedule what can u do. we already talked to admins, to force la to scehdule but they ignored that. I dont see why la should just do as they pleased with no respect for the league. they should follow the flow like everyone else. They have had players and been active for the past weeks so there was no excuse. whine to them why they didnt schedule. and btw if the match did get voided and go into catchup week noone would have right to claim walkover, and they could simply refuse to play - like they did for some weeks now. And no, coming into a channel and screaming "NQR NOW!?!?" isn't considered an attempt to schedule. Lame mentaility growing in NQR from clans and players that just wanna go against anything just to make an upset. Fuck the rules, fuck the admins, fuck the other clans.. lets just do what we want, when we want. If clans do a simple gesture of trying to schedule a game or note the other clans when they before hand decide not to show up for shceduled games.. then what are they doing here? The system is made so clans can handle schedules in own regi without admin interferrence. The deadlines are very long so only reason why they wouldn't be kept is cause of inactivity or unwillingness. Neither of these 2 reasons should be valid for a top clan. Maybe div1 clans just require more strict guidelines and admins that can cut through. This has been an issue since the first smackdown. I look forward to the first tournament that take initiative for steady play days and time scehdules so every clan knows when to play.
   
ParadokS (130.225.71.251) 2004-03-01 17:39:42
"if clans _do not_ do a simple gesture" even.
   
riker (81.226.74.163) 2004-03-01 18:20:34
we asked sr a thousand times to play nqr, and they said no. and when we say "we dont know, ill ask" we get banned. great. everyone in nqr gets a second chance!
   
dak (213.113.123.12) 2004-03-01 18:29:27
xhrl, because I'm pissed that one of the more interesting and probably spectator-packed matches of div1 is solved through a lameass WO. I'm of the opinion that WO shouldn't even exist; if the clans can't come up with a time when they both can play then don't give either of them points. They have obviously both been trying. This is a game that inflicts everyone that wants to spec it, that's why I commented.
   
ParadokS (130.225.71.251) 2004-03-01 18:34:39
what bullshit :) la never tried to schedule this game, u only came to slackers few times screaming "NQR NOW??" Anyway we never said we didnt want a game, we just wanted to know WHEN to play, but even that you couldnt handle. Didn'twanna loose chance to get points from thisn game, cause u refuse to play. We have lots of nqr this week included FS on thursday. After that, if it's convinient for lege artis, we can scehdule the game. Preferebly a date/time where you actually know you can play.
   
loloo^_^ (62.72.237.219) 2004-03-01 19:33:28
repee angry vihaa med bacondox plz die..
   
HangTime (213.208.111.197) 2004-03-01 20:48:50
well i don't know everything that has gone on obviously, but I do know that SR made attempts to schedule this game. It's a week2 game, so LA should have been on the money in trying to schedule a date and time to play by now. Maybe this WO will be a wakeup call to those clans that view the schedule as nothing more than an inconvienience, rather than an integral part of the league structure.
   
Noffe (217.210.189.70) 2004-03-02 04:49:03
Demos???
   
error (213.114.96.75) 2004-03-02 09:59:03
I would be very happy if the game could be played anyway. Its not like a wo is final if both teams clearly want to play.
   
rekk (194.251.240.113) 2004-03-02 19:02:06
I totally agree with HangTime. This is an example of what happens when a clan is not active enough.
   
DaEagle (130.240.201.79) 2004-03-03 13:27:18
This is what happens when biased newbies runs the league. No, I don?t have all facts but this shit never happened in the good old days when ppl actually played for fun and not only for the fame.
   
manu (130.235.174.146) 2004-03-04 01:57:35
i guess this happend while para still was an admin?
   
Goljat (195.10.181.163) 2004-03-04 07:50:28
manu wtf? read post #15
   
Kumikala (80.186.21.242) 2004-03-04 08:49:53
Why can't SR play when they have 4 and LA asks "nqr now" ? Do SR prac 5h before every match or what? ;/
   
Kumikala (80.186.21.242) 2004-03-04 08:53:00
And btw how can paradoks whine about "following the flow" when SR have played only 6 matches and LA 9?
   
lavos (130.230.92.13) 2004-03-04 09:36:15
kinda lol wo. What does it matter if this game was not played when it was supposed to. This rule aint followed for example in div2. Clans play vs any clan they can and the sum of played matches counts, not the Week Schedule. Weird that it was so important in this particular match :G Mysterious are the ways of QW. Atleast when it has something to do with SR :[
   
lavos (130.230.92.13) 2004-03-04 09:45:35
oh and btw LA sux too :<
   
mem (62.65.118.114) 2004-03-04 13:51:26
hi dudes! lineups ???
   
ParadokS (130.225.71.251) 2004-03-04 15:45:18
even more resaon to take the WO. If LA have time enough to play matches from week9, it's just even clearer they refuse to play us. Makes it even better reason to take the WO - why let the points go to waste?
   
memil (217.209.171.199) 2004-03-04 17:13:37
great game paradoks, you rock, gl in nqr, i hope you win!!
   
dag (217.211.109.109) 2004-03-05 01:35:44
haha para maybe our "week9 opponents" said yes when we asked them "nqr now?!?!"
   
unnamed (213.101.37.123) 2004-03-05 05:46:33
isnt there the "catchup week" ? So sr and la can play then???
   
[SM]Rille (194.47.126.172) 2004-03-05 06:42:38
LOL, all you wankers need to just stfu and agree on a date!
   
m0lle (217.174.65.46) 2004-03-05 10:37:27
st?rsta LOLET i nqr #6 om denna ej spelas.. Kamma er Slackers o spela matchen
   
seni (217.37.205.217) 2004-03-05 11:17:08
aina yhta vaikeet hohoi snif e tajuu. toisaalt tyopaivat menee hilpeasti nait lukiessa. gg.
   
xhrl (24.80.51.162) 2004-03-06 02:41:42
"DaEagle - 130.240.201.79 2004-03-03 13:27:18 This is what happens when biased newbies runs the league. No, I don?t have all facts but this shit never happened in the good old days when ppl actually played for fun and not only for the fame." 1. you don't have the facts. 2. you have a selective memory from "the good old days....." so, when during any tourney online have games not been hard to arrange??? I have been an admin in many tournies over the years and you are quite misled if you feel it has ever been different. 3. you assume someone plays qw now for "fame"... hehe, that made me chuckle. 4. Your uninformed inflammatory remarks against me, as a member of the admin crew, earn you my derision, daEagle: and you claim that you remember and represent a more honorable time in "the good old days"??? yes, and i guess comments like yours were all apart of that? you'd have to stop eating the peanuts out of your own shit before anyone gives any credence to your offensive remark:(
   
killis (212.181.78.167) 2004-03-06 17:18:19
omg i thought legeartis would win this! but i guess para stole a wo and did not get caught! crime dose not pay!
   
rx (194.47.241.42) 2004-03-06 20:59:10
pretty bg for lege artis? :( slackers aren't exactly favourites, or the most active clan in division 1. Perhaps lege artis underestimated the power of CS and admin abuse combination. We'll do our best not to make same mistake, thanks for the wake up call lege artis =D (thanks paradoks for inspiration)
   
Dahmer (213.65.11.223) 2004-03-07 00:02:31
j?vla paragrafryttare SR ?r, ?r allting inte perfekt s? ?r det no game ALLTID. V?gra spela den h?r matchen f?r r?tt ska va r?tt och dom e skitis f?r att loosa.
   
DaEagle (213.64.110.22) 2004-03-07 21:58:06
xhrl QUOTE 3. you assume someone plays qw now for "fame"... hehe, that made me chuckle. So you are saying everyone plays for fun nowdays? Then why give a team Walk Over in the game which many pepople consider the most interesting game this season? Thats what you could do in a game with a huge scene involving pricemoney like Counter Strike, NOT in a scene with about 1000 players. If in this case SR had >4 players online many times why couldn?t they play the game then? I mean it?s only for fun, right ? Regarding old times, atleast we played to see who wins and just not only who is the best "paragrafryttare"(c)dahmer and/or have the best connection to the admins. And if 199X (good old days) was a more honorable time in the qw-scene? Not that I claimed it before but since you ask, hell yeah it was.
   
xhrl (24.80.51.162) 2004-03-07 22:36:42
i never said ppl play only for fun; some actually play for honour etc.,. "If in this case SR had >4 players online many times why couldn?t they play the game then?" Unfortunately i am not at liberty to discuss details, but it is not as clear cut a scenario as you suggest. I will just beg to differ on your view of the past. For it seems to me there were just as many lameass things going on then, if not more so because of the size of the scene; but equally there may have been more honour, too, for the same reason. I guess it depends on one's experience and pov.
   
rx (194.47.241.42) 2004-03-08 05:05:58
i think the problem is how different clans feel about playing. some play for fun, while others want to win really bad. right now theres a lot of backtalking and stuff going on, and though some players (like paradoks) certainly could do without it, i think its important to understand that this sense of rivalry is part of the fun for many other players. being mature has nothing to do with it. belonging to a "clan" and standing up for your friends even though you might not agree with them - has everything to do with it. right now the qw scene bears more resemblance to professional wrestling than a sport like say- hockey, or soccer. well that's enough of an analysis for now :) play the game.
   
Dahmer (213.65.11.223) 2004-03-08 11:28:18
this game will not be played again since SR lost to BGSR
   
Goljat (80.221.43.154) 2004-03-08 11:56:58
its already played, so stfu.
   
sayonara (213.64.138.93) 2004-03-08 12:37:52
goljat do you even know what played means?
   
Gamer (193.166.235.171) 2004-03-11 21:25:48
Kumikala: yepp we wanna prepare for the tough matches.
   
Hixen (213.226.68.75) 2004-03-12 10:58:38
Paradoks, come on.. didnt you learn anything in hixenschool, YOU dont accept WO if you are given it, you ALLWAYS try as hard as possible to play your games.. I thought playing games what it's all about, instead of getting wo.. I'm ok with nqr admins wanting the games to be played, but as clanleader for a clan YOU fucking dont accept WO before the end of the season, there is allways a way. this was VERY cheap paradoks, very cheap.. b?????? and for the NQR admins, try to relax.
   
nussi (81.226.57.166) 2004-03-14 20:51:02
puss
   
(213.113.50.149) (213.113.50.149) 2004-03-15 14:09:13
para and goljat are fags.
   
Haggis (not hagge :) (193.217.233.27) 2004-03-19 15:01:43
GG HIXEN, True old school spirit. I understand para and the other admins want rules to be followed, with so many divisions this is a must, but setting an example with the two top clans that everyone wants to watch is not good. Now that it's decided why don't play the match anyway, im sure the LA guys are quite eager to spank some SR ass like they did in Flaming Fist (dag and legend MVS-AKKE :) And it's a good chance for the SR guys to show that they have control over their heads with all the outside pressure. Best of 10 maps makes it LOL for all us n00bs out there dying to see a killer game. So Para, get of your tuborg-fuel'd horse and give LA a match to remember. IT STILL JUST A FUCKING GAME!!!
   
rekk (194.251.240.114) 2004-03-21 19:46:48
I didn't know that you can get fame from a wo.
   
weedmaster (81.175.152.111) 2004-03-24 00:29:48
Smoke More Weed :]
   
kippo (80.186.135.242) 2004-03-26 19:04:04
gg
   
Dude (82.182.102.37) 2004-04-02 10:34:55
LOL LEGEARTIS HAD BETTER PING! ;) If legeartis would have won, this is what Paradoks would have writen in here.
   
nas (81.228.224.118) 2004-04-05 23:16:07
:)
   
 
 

League Coverage
 - News
 - Battles
 - Map stats
 - Interviews

 - Division 1
 - Division 2
 - Division 3
 - Division 4
 - Division 5
 - Playoffs

League Info
 - Rules
 - Crew
 - Hall of Fame

    © Nations Quake Rank 2004