Battle Info  2004-04-11 Division 1 - Week 1 (8)
 

 
Four Kings 0 - 2 EarthQuake
 
 

W.O. - Walkover

0-1

Reports
-

Demos
-


 
 

W.O. - Walkover

0-1

Reports
-

Demos
-


 
Comments
 
nikke (62.168.140.137) 2004-02-02 22:56:40
gg
   
Horatio (213.113.172.227) 2004-02-06 09:03:29
gg
   
gaz (81.77.178.187) 2004-04-11 23:39:41
W.O. given based on the fact that EQ tried to schedule this game at the time. Precedent set for Zoo vs HA in div 3.
   
snake (217.209.103.16) 2004-04-12 00:04:50
lamah
   
Janozh (213.112.181.189) 2004-04-12 00:53:38
Sad with w.o but had no choice :(
   
Hagge (217.210.145.76) 2004-04-12 03:10:30
lol this was week1 game? what happend to the rules? :|
   
sexC (61.152.211.58) 2004-04-12 06:20:28
pretty lol that eq can claim a wo vs 4k now, seeing that clans like la and tvs can't claim wo's vs divines (although they are inactive, or am I mistaken here?)
   
BOOster (81.226.73.222) 2004-04-12 10:35:34
We tried do schedule this match many times but they couldn't get four players! We don't want to play 4on3 like TVS did so we both agreed to give us a w.o This was to get fair scores in the end since every other clan they have played has taken three points! Anyone disagree? We could have put in Bagheera and renamed him as serox or anyone and played 4on1 .. would that be more pleasant for you, whineing fuckers?
   
Hagge (217.210.145.76) 2004-04-12 11:21:55
the thing is not if the wo was granted or not.. they thing is that u can't take wo's in catchup week?
   
Firehoppir (213.113.117.32) 2004-04-12 14:04:16
Well we scheduled 5 times and they didnt have 4 players.. and at the last day os group play and the last possible changse to play they could?nt.. so we had to claim wo... what?s up hagge... you wanna meet LA instaed of us in playoffs? ;O)
   
Keyser (81.6.229.195) 2004-04-12 16:01:55
Bacon It would have been very unfair on EQ if they could not have gotten WO because they tried to organise a game with me at least 4-5 times and other times with splif i think, and each time we had to cancel because we did not have enuff players. If I'd have known that WO is not allowed in final week then I would have given it to them earlier. Some of our players had other committments and we struggled to find a team most of the time, especially recently (hence playing vs TVS with 3). Sorry for all the messing around..
   
uiG (145.254.247.122) 2004-04-12 22:40:32
nice moves on dm3 from 4k, so fast and smooth !
   
Firehoppir (213.113.117.32) 2004-04-13 02:31:58
keyser soze.. feer him!
   
Keyser (81.6.229.195) 2004-04-13 13:56:58
Haha ph33r teh phireh0pp1r!
   
Hagge (217.210.145.76) 2004-04-13 19:24:06
well the thing is that the same rules were used last season but we didn't get wo then because "no wo's in catchup week" same rules are used not but obviously not being followed? :( that's why I whine a bit :E
   
spliffy (213.208.104.47) 2004-04-17 18:58:08
yeh straight up top drawer shit, as keys said me and him tried to sort it a good few times but our players cudnt make it any time we tried, so yeah we wud have given it too them earlier if we had knew, so they shud get it now seeing as it was our fault.
   
Firehoppir (213.113.117.32) 2004-04-14 19:10:20
whine at my kfjump and kenya luck instead :P
   
 
 

League Coverage
 - News
 - Battles
 - Map stats
 - Interviews

 - Division 1
 - Division 2
 - Division 3
 - Division 4
 - Division 5
 - Playoffs

League Info
 - Rules
 - Crew
 - Hall of Fame

    Nations Quake Rank 2004