|
Anonymous (81.226.3.55) |
2003-11-20 01:11:39 |
lol, 4on3? why? |
|
|
yveZ (195.64.93.181) |
2003-11-20 03:06:53 |
lol, Anonymous? why? |
|
|
N1eLZz (213.84.22.250) |
2003-11-20 08:57:46 |
:| |
|
|
moRtiZ (194.143.226.130) |
2003-11-20 09:00:37 |
Why? |
|
|
m (194.251.240.114) |
2003-11-20 09:08:13 |
why it wasn't played 3v3? |
|
|
Katsku (81.22.162.228) |
2003-11-20 10:15:30 |
Cause we could not produce 4 players and we dont give WOs and 3vs3 sucks and doesnt really matter cause victory of Div4 missed anyway. |
|
|
zilch (213.67.248.71) |
2003-11-20 12:03:21 |
we thought we would win ez 3vs4, but having one player less was a little more difficult than anticipated, and the radiant nails were a little sharper than expected. gg's to RN, but bg in overall. hopefully now the admins will let us add members though :< |
|
|
Hagge (217.210.145.127) |
2003-11-20 12:04:34 |
ye.. have to agree with katsku there.. this is 4on4 league so why play 3on3? nice of T still trying to win and if it had been 4on4 I?m sure they would?ve won this quite easy! |
|
|
FlePser (80.60.182.5) |
2003-11-20 16:33:54 |
a mere fragdifference on dm2, gg :E, yv gg you won again lame dutch mofo |
|
|
|
|