|
| Anonymous (81.226.3.55) |
2003-11-20 01:11:39 |
| lol, 4on3? why? |
| |
|
| yveZ (195.64.93.181) |
2003-11-20 03:06:53 |
| lol, Anonymous? why? |
| |
|
| N1eLZz (213.84.22.250) |
2003-11-20 08:57:46 |
| :| |
| |
|
| moRtiZ (194.143.226.130) |
2003-11-20 09:00:37 |
| Why? |
| |
|
| m (194.251.240.114) |
2003-11-20 09:08:13 |
| why it wasn't played 3v3? |
| |
|
| Katsku (81.22.162.228) |
2003-11-20 10:15:30 |
| Cause we could not produce 4 players and we dont give WOs and 3vs3 sucks and doesnt really matter cause victory of Div4 missed anyway. |
| |
|
| zilch (213.67.248.71) |
2003-11-20 12:03:21 |
| we thought we would win ez 3vs4, but having one player less was a little more difficult than anticipated, and the radiant nails were a little sharper than expected. gg's to RN, but bg in overall. hopefully now the admins will let us add members though :< |
| |
|
| Hagge (217.210.145.127) |
2003-11-20 12:04:34 |
| ye.. have to agree with katsku there.. this is 4on4 league so why play 3on3? nice of T still trying to win and if it had been 4on4 I?m sure they would?ve won this quite easy! |
| |
|
| FlePser (80.60.182.5) |
2003-11-20 16:33:54 |
| a mere fragdifference on dm2, gg :E, yv gg you won again lame dutch mofo |
| |
|
|
|