Empezar - 213.113.96.*** |
2004-10-17 23:51:33 |
1 hour to get 4ms higher ping, when we were about to get raped
anyways.. gg |
|
|
gaz - 81.77.177.*** |
2004-10-18 00:03:25 |
Kinda unexpected... nice one dybbuk! |
|
|
stax - 213.66.149.*** |
2004-10-18 00:12:23 |
we got owned :( |
|
|
sassa - 213.113.238.*** |
2004-10-18 00:15:08 |
juppz, totaly owned.. very nice tp by dybbuk, SHIT!!! but u guys got
your qw
drama... :) |
|
|
oggie - 213.113.96.*** |
2004-10-18 00:27:01 |
ja j?vlar... |
|
|
Empezar - 213.113.96.*** |
2004-10-18 01:29:24 |
would be interesting to meet dybbuk when they are NOT sitting in the
same room |
|
|
penta - 81.229.148.*** |
2004-10-18 01:43:57 |
well played Dybbuk! |
|
|
mosquito - 213.54.227.*** |
2004-10-18 09:14:02 |
We are like stuck in one room, cant leave it anyways... ;) ggs. and
thanks to
sassa for understanding our ping-concerns (a.k.a. whining) |
|
|
Empezar - 213.113.96.*** |
2004-10-18 15:48:51 |
I can't understand how a clan which plays in the same room, facing a
clan which
plays from difference cities, can whine about a 1-4ms advantage in
ping. "-
Well you had one player with 26 ms!", well, we also had one player
with
56ms!...
this ping whine is the worst thing I've ever been
through in
my 7 years of QuakeWorld. I'll give you guys the gold medal of whine.
even I
don't have a chance of getting that medal with you playing QW. |
|
|
panic - 213.65.124.*** |
2004-10-18 16:30:16 |
unfair pings, plz rematch. sassa vi ses p? e1m2 ;) |
|
|
Vandal - 212.202.40.*** |
2004-10-18 17:28:46 |
Actually we didnt whine at all. All we wanted is fair pings. We felt
that a
significant number of players of fnu had better pings than we have,
especially
fnu's best players. This is not offset if you have a single player
with a
really bad ping (especially since we didnt expect this player to be
among your
best anyways). Please also note that there was a server were we all
had good
pings except for one of your players from your line up which was
supposed to
play. But we didnt ask for anything special anyways. All we asked was
for fair
pings.
The fact that we sit in one room has nothing to do
with this at
all. The rules talk about fair pings. But they dont talk about sitting
in the
same room, nor do they talk about if its unfair if the computers of
one team are
faster, if each team has equal amount of time to practice
etc.
I hope
you believe us when I say we would have much rather played this game
as quickly
as possible, since most of us have stuff todo early on
mondays.
So to
conclude we pulled off a surprising victory on dm3 with fair pings for
both
teams and we are quite pleased with the results. We also like to thank
Sassa for
doing his share in handling things in a fair manner. |
|
|
Empezar - 213.113.96.*** |
2004-10-18 17:39:15 |
lol, sassa raised his ping to 50 and still you whined, because I had
26 ping.
Look at the scores now, and see who got the least frags on both maps,
yeah it
was me. |
|
|
Vandal - 212.202.40.*** |
2004-10-18 18:39:30 |
Actually we are fine when Sassa raised his ping. However it was
decided we
should instead wait for para to set the minping. I dont quite recall
how that
decision was made. Eitherway there was certainly no lengthy discussion
about
this.
Anyways Empezar, I really dont understand your
complaints. The
rules state that pings should be fair. The pings were fair in the end,
they were
not fair to one side depending on which server we tried before para
came and set
minping. So I really dont get the problem. All the cursing and
personal insults
were all quite uncalled far considering that we never echoded any of
the
increasingly inflamatory attacks from our side. |
|
|
Vandal - 212.202.40.*** |
2004-10-18 18:40:47 |
hehe .. The two words were supposed to be "your side" .. freudian
typo? .. I
hope not! |
|
|
Apollyon - 160.45.22.*** |
2004-10-18 19:47:30 |
Actually for me this mindgame was part of the prewar. Except that
unlike what
happpens during normal prewar it had effect! |
|
|
Empezar - 213.113.96.*** |
2004-10-18 20:44:34 |
you would have won the game anyways, because you had much better TP.
whether or
not that was because you were in the same room, I don't give a fuck. 1
hour was
wasted on this bullshit. paradoks came and set a minping... 2 of our
players got
4ms higher ping - yeehaw! now pings are even! now we can play! |
|
|
son - 217.238.30.*** |
2004-10-18 23:25:25 |
gg Dybbuk, weiter so! |
|
|
Hagge - 217.210.145.*** |
2004-10-19 11:27:40 |
omg dybbuk impresses! or is it fnu that has gotten much worse?? :< |
|
|
Apollyon - 160.45.22.*** |
2004-10-19 15:31:05 |
@Hagge: both! |
|
|
Sassa - 213.113.238.*** |
2004-10-19 16:33:45 |
Apollyon, the mind game worked SO damn good on us! we lost everything,
before
the game, we were pumped up etc but when u guys started to complain
EMP whent
berzerk and I with my QW history know what kind of game u guys were
playing but
follish emp didnt know jack shit and he lost all his
concentration!
me
myself lost it aswell after a huge fight with emp before the
game
well
GG's |
|
|
mosquito - 213.54.250.*** |
2004-10-19 18:33:52 |
Actually we never planned to play any "mindgames" on you, sassa. I
totally
agree with vandals posting, normally we just want to play our game,
drink our
beer and get some sleep... |
|
|
SmalaGreger - 81.224.80.*** |
2004-10-19 18:44:00 |
fu apollyon |
|
|
SmalaGreger - 81.224.80.*** |
2004-10-19 18:47:51 |
we havent gotten worse 8( |
|
|
Empezar - 213.113.96.*** |
2004-10-19 18:55:17 |
if ping didn't make a clan worse, why would dybbuk want us to raise
our ping?
of course we got worse with higher ping. |
|
|
ext - 82.133.65.*** |
2004-11-02 00:00:49 |
rofl! average pings are bang on both games, and besides 45 ping is
still
perfectly playable just 95% of the time you swedes refuse to play
above 13ms
:F
|
|
|