| Vickers - 81.182.52.136 |
2003-05-28 10:18:03 |
| ggs |
| |
|
| Hagge - 217.209.191.69 |
2003-05-28 13:09:22 |
| bg.. 3on3 shouldn?t be allowed.... zzz? |
| |
|
| Hagge - 217.209.191.69 |
2003-05-28 13:10:45 |
| also having some troubles understanding why u play 3on3 when there are ppl from both clans speccing! |
| |
|
| Vickers - 81.182.52.136 |
2003-05-28 13:21:55 |
| For some reason their 4th player didn`t want to play. They offered 4on3, but to make it even we took 3on3 instead. |
| |
|
| Katsku - 81.22.162.228 |
2003-05-28 14:12:45 |
| We didn't have 4 players when the first map started, Eject showed up after second map was started (?). HLT is our player too, but not registered in nqr. |
| |
|
| Domin - 62.78.175.57 |
2003-05-29 13:03:34 |
| Owned by me :) (3on3 sux, but its better than 3 versus 4) |
| |
|
| Chipi - 152.66.248.109 |
2003-05-29 13:50:18 |
| 3on3 is no team, maybe it's "some kind of team", but far from it. Shouldn't be allowed:( |
| |
|
| Mandos - 81.197.2.140 |
2003-05-29 23:17:39 |
| Better 3on3 than no game at all...
Walkovers are for lamers. |
| |
|
| Hagge - 217.209.191.69 |
2003-06-01 12:07:11 |
| nah rather walkover than 3on3 because this is a 4on4 league.. if u can?t get 4 ppl then don?t play and leave wo |
| |
|
